<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holiday drink or not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 00:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuaca and the Ruth&#8217;s Chris Steakhouse Sidecar &#124; The Pegu Blog</title>
		<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/#comment-3035</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuaca and the Ruth&#8217;s Chris Steakhouse Sidecar &#124; The Pegu Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 15:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scofflawsden.com/blog/?p=560#comment-3035</guid>
		<description>[...] Tuaca is no exception, has a whole list of what SeanMike, over at The Scofflaw&#8217;s Den, calls Marketing Cocktails: What I consider a marketing cocktail involves the following aspects: It usually has a cute name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tuaca is no exception, has a whole list of what SeanMike, over at The Scofflaw&#8217;s Den, calls Marketing Cocktails: What I consider a marketing cocktail involves the following aspects: It usually has a cute name [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Parrott</title>
		<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/#comment-3034</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Parrott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scofflawsden.com/blog/?p=560#comment-3034</guid>
		<description>Yeah, according to a recent article in the NYT, what was bottled as Laird&#039;s applejack was 100% apple brandy until the late 1970s.  So of the currently available products, Laird&#039;s bond most resembles the applejack Papa had in his Jack Roses.  However, there&#039;s more than a small chance that Papa&#039;s applejack was raised in used barrels, instead of new barrels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, according to a recent article in the NYT, what was bottled as Laird&#8217;s applejack was 100% apple brandy until the late 1970s.  So of the currently available products, Laird&#8217;s bond most resembles the applejack Papa had in his Jack Roses.  However, there&#8217;s more than a small chance that Papa&#8217;s applejack was raised in used barrels, instead of new barrels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanMike</title>
		<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scofflawsden.com/blog/?p=560#comment-2994</guid>
		<description>A correction:  any of the Laird&#039;s that is bottled in bond is 100% apple brandy.  EDIT: The applejack that I used last time I made this drink was non-BiB.

Captain Apple Jack is labeled as &quot;apple brandy&quot; on the bottle.  The BiB that I taste tested against it a few posts back is labeled apple brandy.  The bottle you can see in the pictures included in that post were actually labeled &quot;applejack&quot; - all one word - and once I find more of them I&#039;ll compare them as well.

I also have a bottle of the Laird&#039;s 7 1/2 year old apple brandy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A correction:  any of the Laird&#8217;s that is bottled in bond is 100% apple brandy.  EDIT: The applejack that I used last time I made this drink was non-BiB.</p>
<p>Captain Apple Jack is labeled as &#8220;apple brandy&#8221; on the bottle.  The BiB that I taste tested against it a few posts back is labeled apple brandy.  The bottle you can see in the pictures included in that post were actually labeled &#8220;applejack&#8221; &#8211; all one word &#8211; and once I find more of them I&#8217;ll compare them as well.</p>
<p>I also have a bottle of the Laird&#8217;s 7 1/2 year old apple brandy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanMike</title>
		<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/#comment-2993</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanMike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scofflawsden.com/blog/?p=560#comment-2993</guid>
		<description>You know, you keep saying that, but you still haven&#039;t shown me any more reliable source of present-day applejack.

Laird&#039;s is the original source since the 18th century or before - and yes, they use basically apple brandy mixed with neutral spirits.  But they still CALL it applejack - and bartenders, retailers, and distillers across the country consider it applejack.  In fact, I&#039;ve never seen any other brand sold, period.

Vermouth - with the exception of Dolin - isn&#039;t made the same way it used to be, but it&#039;s still considered vermouth.  For better or worse, times and methods change.  The company that for over 200 years has really defined the product defines it now as it&#039;s made, and so - right now - it&#039;s what it&#039;s in that bottle.

IF someone else came out and made concentrated apple cider, they could call it applejack too - but no one makes that as far as I know.  I&#039;ve never seen any other product in the US - or heard of anyone else seeing one - that calls itself applejack on the market.

Lord knows I&#039;d buy it if I did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, you keep saying that, but you still haven&#8217;t shown me any more reliable source of present-day applejack.</p>
<p>Laird&#8217;s is the original source since the 18th century or before &#8211; and yes, they use basically apple brandy mixed with neutral spirits.  But they still CALL it applejack &#8211; and bartenders, retailers, and distillers across the country consider it applejack.  In fact, I&#8217;ve never seen any other brand sold, period.</p>
<p>Vermouth &#8211; with the exception of Dolin &#8211; isn&#8217;t made the same way it used to be, but it&#8217;s still considered vermouth.  For better or worse, times and methods change.  The company that for over 200 years has really defined the product defines it now as it&#8217;s made, and so &#8211; right now &#8211; it&#8217;s what it&#8217;s in that bottle.</p>
<p>IF someone else came out and made concentrated apple cider, they could call it applejack too &#8211; but no one makes that as far as I know.  I&#8217;ve never seen any other product in the US &#8211; or heard of anyone else seeing one &#8211; that calls itself applejack on the market.</p>
<p>Lord knows I&#8217;d buy it if I did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://scofflawsden.com/blog/2008/12/11/holiday-drink-or-not/#comment-2992</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scofflawsden.com/blog/?p=560#comment-2992</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re not using applejack. Get it right or pay the price, Budnick. (yes that was a Salute Your Shorts reference, you&#039;re probably too old to get it)

Also, in re: Hanukkah -- potato latkes and sufganiot (fried jelly donuts). Brisket and chicken for protein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re not using applejack. Get it right or pay the price, Budnick. (yes that was a Salute Your Shorts reference, you&#8217;re probably too old to get it)</p>
<p>Also, in re: Hanukkah &#8212; potato latkes and sufganiot (fried jelly donuts). Brisket and chicken for protein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Using theme: Writer by ThemeFuse.com 
Elapsed time: 0.1129 seconds 
Memory usage: 25,427,968 bytes 
-->